It has been known for 30 years that pseudorandom number generators in the class of \emph{linear congruential generators} (LCG) exhibit strong and predictable regularities. A widely used generator in this class is \texttt{drand48}. While the regularity is not problematic in most applications, I show that it can produce very misleading results in testing geometric algorithms that involve determinant computations. By presenting scenarios where LCG behave `nonrandom' (sometimes in a spectacular way), I want to raise awareness for possible problems with LCG and pseudorandom numbers in general.

---

Back to the publications page